Categories
dereliction of duty police brutality

Shooter At Large – Huron Residents To Lockdown After Seaforth Shooting & Cover-up #CamerasUp

(Seaforth, Ontario) Huron OPP are now facing attempted murder allegations after an apparent botched execution attempt in Seaforth.

NOTE: Traditional media have used a cropped photo to help cover-up the unjustified shooting. The image below is from the SIU report, and contains one of the bullet holes proving it was an unjustified shooting. All other media outlets have chosen to edit out or omit the bullet hole.

The SIU evidence and investigation shows that Huron OPP repeatedly failed to use standard and appropriate methods to stop a vehicle, and instead tried to execute unarmed civilians in an extrajudicial punitive measure. The telltale bullet holes in the vehicle clearly show the officer lied in his notes, and then they refused to be interviewed. All residents of Huron County are encouraged to lockdown their property and video record ALL police interactions until this officer’s name is released.

The SIU’s decision to exonerate the officer in Case #23-PFI-424 is a grotesque miscarriage of justice. The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the officer’s gunfire was not defensive but retaliatory, targeting the passenger (Complainant #1) after the vehicle had already passed him. The SIU’s conclusion that this shooting was “reasonable” is a disgrace—it rewards reckless violence and sends a clear message: police can shoot first, fabricate a threat later, and walk away unscathed.


1. The Shooting Was Not Defensive – It Was Punitive

A. The Officer Was No Longer in Danger When He Fired

  • The SIU admits there is conflicting evidence on whether the SUV was moving when shots were fired.
  • Video footage (from residential cameras) suggests the vehicle was already turning away when the officer discharged his firearm.
  • Forensic evidence shows bullets struck the passenger-side windshield and door—areas that would not be in the officer’s direct line of fire if he were truly defending himself from an oncoming vehicle.

Conclusion: The officer was not firing to stop an imminent threat—he was firing to punish the occupants for fleeing.

B. The Third Shot Was Especially Suspicious

  • Witnesses and audio recordings confirm two rapid shots, followed by a delayed third shot.
  • This pause suggests the officer reassessed and chose to fire again—not in panic, but in retaliation.
  • The bullet that struck Complainant #1 in the chest came from this third shot, proving the officer adjusted his aim to ensure a hit.

Conclusion: This was not “self-defense.” This was an execution attempt.


2. The SIU’s Flawed Justification Relies on Police Privilege

The SIU’s reasoning is a textbook example of cop logic:

  • “He feared for his life”—despite no evidence the civilians were armed.
  • “The SUV was a weapon”—ignoring that the officer stepped in front of it instead of retreating.
  • “The shooting was proportional”—even though three bullets into a fleeing car is excessive by any standard.

The SIU’s decision is not based on facts—it’s based on deference to police.


3. This Was Retaliation, Not Protection

The officer’s actions fit a well-documented pattern of police using lethal force as punishment:

  • Complainant #1 had just evaded arrest—a “sin” that often triggers police rage.
  • The officer shot at the passenger side, where Complainant #1 was seated, despite the driver being the alleged threat.
  • No attempt was made to disable the vehicle (tires, engine block)—the officer chose to shoot at human targets.

This was not about stopping a threat. It was about sending a message: “You don’t run from us.”


4. The SIU’s Decision Encourages More Police Violence

By rubber-stamping this shooting, the SIU has:
✅ Legitimized retaliatory gunfire against unarmed civilians.
✅ Reinforced that police can lie, exaggerate threats, and face no consequences.
✅ Sent a clear signal to officers: If you’re angry, you can shoot.

This is not oversight—it’s complicity.


Final Verdict: A Criminal Act Whitewashed as “Self-Defense”

The evidence proves this shooting was unjustified and retaliatory. The SIU’s decision to clear the officer is a betrayal of justice and a green light for further police violence.

If this is “reasonable,” then the law is broken.


Demand:

  • An independent review of the SIU’s decision.
  • Charges against the officer for aggravated assault.
  • Legislative reform to strip police of their “shoot first, justify later” immunity.
Categories
dereliction of duty police brutality pull overs

Public Outrage After Barrie Police Attempt Murder Of Citizen – #FTP #FilmThePolice

Screams of terror by horrified onlookers with video cameras likely saved a man’s life from Barrie police officers. The officers that stood by or joined in are just as responsible as the out of control officer. 

A 20 year old nearly lost his life after making a flippant remark to a police officer in Barrie, Ontario. The officer loses all self control and attempts to crack open the skull of the 20 year old like a coconut, by repeatedly smashing his restrained victim’s head into the concrete. More officers joined in the fun instead of protecting the unarmed restrained civilian from the out of control cop.

The officer did not need to respond to the remark. Responding with violence and trying to kill the man is an act of terrorism. This was a clear message from the police to the Public that they must show 100% respect and fear of the Barrie police or you may not survive.

Gary Grisdale, who identified himself in messages to CBC News as the man’s brother, said the incident happened after his brother “went through a red light on his longboard after looking both ways to make sure the coast was clear.” Grisdale declined to give his brother’s full name.

Grisdale said the officer ticketed his brother and detained him for about 30 minutes. Afterwards, his brother went back onto the road with his longboard and “lipped the officer off a bit,” he said. The officer “got furious,” Grisdale said, and that is when the video starts.

Until all Barrie police officers wear and use body cameras, and these officers are held to account, FTP considers the Barrie police and those that support them blindly to be terrorists.

https://youtu.be/XI_ppSlBlSc
Categories
dereliction of duty police brutality

Abusive Cop Caught On Video Dragging & Stomping Nursing Student

The UBC nursing student who was seen on surveillance tape being dragged and stepped on by an RCMP officer is speaking out. Mona Wang is suing Corporal Lacy Browning, who denies causing Wang any harm. Browning has been placed on administrative duties as an investigation gets underway.
Categories
dereliction of duty

OPP Threaten Victim & Refuse To Press Charges After Councillor’s Assault On Citizen – Minor Injury Reported

The OPP threatened the victim of North Huron councillor kevin falconer’s attack. He was told that if he wanted to proceed with charges, 7 people (councillor members) will claim he attacked/assaulted the councillor. Luckily the victim only received a minor wrist injury.

The victim asked for charges to be laid against Councillor kevin falconer for his physical assault on 14Aug2020, the officer flatly refused. The victim asked to speak to the officer’s supervisor, the officer stated they might be able to make that happen in a few days. The victim told the officer if he couldn’t figure out who is telling the truth, “arrest both of us and let a judge sort it out.” The officer refused that suggestion.

This officer just happens to be Hall Of Shamer kevin McPerjury. You likely remember him from the August Atrocities which ultimately led to the disbanding of the Wingham Police. NOTE: 5 councillors were caught all telling the exact same lie to the police/court and McPurjury was caught lying on the stand. Thanks to Wingham Copwatch their lies were exposed and all their fabricated charges dismissed.

Categories
pull overs

OPP Caught On Video Creating Lie To Justify Illegal Search In Court – Officer Repeatedly States He Didn’t Smell Cannabis Then Agrees To Lie

OPP Officer 2: Ok, let’s say “you smelled cannabis”
OPP Officer 1: Sure, yeah.
OPP Officer 2: Let’s say that.
OPP Officer 1: That’s fine.

That’s how easy it is for the OPP to fabricate a story and to destroy someone’s reputation, dignity and future. Their victims are normally out thousands of dollars in legal fees and have to take time off work to defend against this grotesque abuse by the police. It’s their word against yours in court, unless you video record it.

December 20th Kyle Pickering, a 27 year-old from Mitchell was followed by a marked OPP cruiser for 8kms from Mitchell to Dublin. Eventually the officer pulled over the vehicle under the pretense of suspicion of impaired driving. 

What followed was captured on video by the victim. The phone was seized and video evidence was deleted by OPP officers. The victim later recovered the video.

The officer claims his victim was pulled over under suspicion of impaired driving. The OPP officer did not notice any signs of impairment and no demand for a breath test was made.  At this point more OPP officers are on route to the scene and the victim is video recording.

The officer then claims to smell cannabis and opens the victim’s car door and demands to search the vehicle.

The victim truthfully states there is no marijuana in the vehicle. 

The officer attempts to forcibly remove the victim from his vehicle. 

The victim objected and demanded to speak to the officer’s supervisor.

Instead of waiting for the backup officers to confirm the odor of marijuana and legal grounds for a search, the officer assaulted the victim, seized his phone and searched his vehicle.

No drugs were found during the illegal search.

The officers are then caught on video discussing how they need to say they smelled cannabis to make the search appear legal in court.

Once the officers realize the victim’s phone is still recording, they delete the video.

The victim recovered the deleted video.